[HiDARG-MEMBERS] To important to not share....

[David Prock]

Nora - Thanks for voicing your concern. Sandy and I are in agreement with
your statements.

73 ... Dave Prock
          N7VIM.DAVE at gmail.com
          n7vim at arrl.net

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, 6:53 AM Nora <nweed at prodigy.net> wrote:

> Max this message appears to me to be political and there are members (I am
> included) who think this should be a “non political” or safe place for Ham
> Radio enthusiasts.   If you should continue to use this email forum to post
> your political point of view I will have to bow out.  Sincerely, Nora Weed
> NW7CQ
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jan 15, 2020, at 4:02 PM, Max Vaughan <maxv at horizonps.com> wrote:
>
> 
>
>
>
> https://act.nraila.org/actions/campaigns/7609
>
>
>
> LC 38 would require all firearms to be locked with a trigger-locking
> device or kept in a locked container, unless carried by the possessor of a
> firearm, with each firearm not secured constituting a separate
> violation. Anyone who has their firearms lost or stolen would be strictly
> liable for any injury to persons or property if the firearm were not stored
> in compliance with the law. And, this liability will last for up to two
> years! Firearm owners would also be held liable for any injury occurring
> within two years that results from a firearm transferred to another
> individual if the firearm was not transferred in a locked container or with
> a locking device.
>
> Gun safety and storage is a matter of personal responsibility and every
> person’s situation is different. It is unreasonable for the law to impose a
> one-size-fits-all solution. This poorly thought out proposal is without any
> consideration for personal circumstances. In short, this measure invades
> people’s homes and forces them to render their firearms useless in
> self-defense.
>
> This bill would also require firearm owners to report lost or stolen
> firearms within 72 hours or face charges, with each firearm constituting a
> separate offense. In addition, those who do not report their firearms lost
> or stolen would be held liable for any injury that occurs within two years
> involving those firearms. A firearm owner should not be held liable for the
> crimes committed by a person who has illegally obtained their
> firearm. Individuals should not be further victimized after experiencing a
> burglary or other crime.
>
> *Again, please contact your state legislators and ask them to oppose LC 38
> when the session begins on February 3rd. In the meantime, please stay tuned
> to your email inbox and **www.nraila.org* <http://www.nraila.org/>* for
> further updates on issues impacting your Second Amendment rights in Oregon.*
> _______________________________________________
> HiDARG-Members mailing list
> HiDARG-Members at hidarg.org
> http://hidarg.org/mailman/listinfo/hidarg-members_hidarg.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> HiDARG-Members mailing list
> HiDARG-Members at hidarg.org
> http://hidarg.org/mailman/listinfo/hidarg-members_hidarg.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hidarg.org/pipermail/hidarg-members_hidarg.org/attachments/20200116/daffd0d5/attachment-0003.htm>